Non-profit vs. Tax-exempt.
Non-profit. The designation of an organization as “non-profit” or “for-profit” is a concept of state law. Under state law, for-profit organizations are created to make money for their owners and investors. Designating an organization as "non-profit" only means that the organization is created for some purpose other than making a profit for owners or investors, but not necessarily for a purpose that would qualify it for exemption from taxes. For more about how to form a non-profit under state law, see my earlier post on starting a non-profit.
Tax-Exempt. Designation of an organization as "nonprofit" under state law does not mean the organization is also "tax-exempt". With few exceptions, organizations must apply to the IRS for a determination of tax-exempt status. There are numerous types of organizations that qualify for various tax exemptions including exemptions from tax on income that is earned in the course of conducting activities related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose. The most common type of tax-exempt organization is a 501(c)(3) organization. To qualify as a 501(c)(3) organization, the organization must apply to the IRS on Form 1023. Some states also require non-profits to submit an application to the state to qualify for exemption from state income tax as well as various other state taxes. For more information about the process of applying for tax-exempt status, see my earlier post on applying for tax-exempt status.
This seems so obvious, but I get at least one call a year to settle an argument about whether all the organization's money has to be spent by the end of the year. Really! So, just to be clear, the designation of an organization as "non-profit" or "tax-exempt" does not mean that the organization can't have money left over in its bank accounts at the end of the year. Money that is not required to meet current expenses should be used to further the organization's mission or can be set-aside as a reserve to cover future expenses.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThanks for helping to explain these law concepts to everyone. It is very helpful and necessary. I like to think I know a lot about nonprofit management and operations but I know that I need to know more when it comes to the legal side. I will have to look at more of your older blog posts too. T.J.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your blog. I am an attorney who is pursuing a Master's in Nonprofit Mgmt, here in Chicago. Have you had any experience with the idea of smaller nonprofits merging? There are so many small nonprofits that seem to be doing the same thing as other nonprofits in another part of town. I know mergers are always scary (for profit or nonprofit) but in this economy, it seems like a way to keep nonprofits afloat and would probably be favored by organizations who make grants. Your thoughts?
ReplyDeleteGreat fundamental information.
ReplyDeleteTaking your last paragraph a step further, I have seen fundraisers slow down or stop completely when they realize that they have reached their goals or have "too much" money in their accounts. Oy vay! (Did I spell that right?) Companies have cash reserves, charities should too. As the last year has taught us, one never knows when that rainy day fund will come in handy.
Shuey Fogel
@nonprofitbanker
Thanks for the comments. Marilyn, I am working on a set of merger case studies. Mergers are risky and if done properly, can be resource intensive. We have seen fewer mergers than expected during this recession, but there are lots of ways to collaborate other than a merger. Stay tuned for the case studies. Should start posting later this week.
ReplyDeleteThank you Ellis for clarifying the terminology. I continue to be amazed by board directors who do not understand the difference (or that money doesn't have to be spent by the end of the year!)
ReplyDelete